The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner Agencies(Stevedores
High Court
12 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner Agencies(Stevedores
Date of order
12 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
1991-92, 1994-95
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner Agencies(Stevedores, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For similar reasons, this appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1107 OF 2007
The CIT Central-III ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.United Liner Agencies(Stevedores)..Respondent
----
Mr.B.M.Chatterji @ Mrs.P.P.Bhosale &
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.P.R.Toprani with Usha I.Dalal for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 12.03.2008.
PC
1. This appeal is in respect of A.Y.1991-92. The
Tribunal by a common order disposed off an appeal in
respect of A.Y.1991-92 as also A.Y.1994-95. The
appeal against A.Y.1994-95 was bearing Appeal
No.901/2007. By a speaking order, we have dismissed
the appeal on the ground that it is purely a finding
of fact.
2. For similar reasons, this appeal also stands
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue