Case Law › High Court › The C.i.t. City-13 v. M/S.ganpatiraj Jai...

The C.i.t. City-13 v. M/S.ganpatiraj Jaigopal

High Court 26 Feb 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The C.i.t. City-13 v. M/S.ganpatiraj Jaigopal, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: Considering the above, appeal as filed does not survive and consequently, appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.225 OF 2004 The C.I.T. City-13 ..Appellant Versus M/s.Ganpatiraj Jaigopal ..Respondent ---- Mr.A.S.Rao for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4.2.2008 PC 1. The question as framed in the memo of appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in Ship ScrapTraders reported in 251 ITR 806 (Bom). 2. Considering the above, appeal as filed does not survive and consequently, appeal stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.