The Cit City-18 v. Mr.k.g.bhagat (Dec) By His Lrs
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-18 v. Mr.k.g.bhagat (Dec) By His Lrs
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit City-18 v. Mr.k.g.bhagat (Dec) By His Lrs, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3655 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1539 OF 2004
The CIT City-18 ..Appellant
Versus
Mr.K.G.Bhagat (Dec) by his LRs ..Respondent
Shri S.K.Bhagat
----
Mr.R.G.Bhat & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 203 days. Considering the
cause shown, delay condoned subject to the appellant
paying to the respondent cost quantified at
Rs.5000/- within 12 weeks from today and also remove
office objections with the same period. Office to
register the appeal.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue