The Cit City-19 Mumbai v. Jagdish I.ruwala
High Court
11 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-19 Mumbai v. Jagdish I.ruwala
Date of order
11 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit City-19 Mumbai v. Jagdish I.ruwala, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2398 OF 2002
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.712 OF 2002
The CIT City-19 Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
Jagdish I.Ruwala ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. As the matter is covered by the judgment of the
Supreme Court, learned Counsel seeks leave to
withdraw the Motion and Appeal. Motion alongwith
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fee
as per rules. Certified copy expedited.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue