Case LawHigh Court › The Cit, City-20, Mumbai v. Arihant Impe...

The Cit, City-20, Mumbai v. Arihant Impex

High Court 01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit, City-20, Mumbai v. Arihant Impex
Date of order
01 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit, City-20, Mumbai v. Arihant Impex, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.661 OF 2008 The CIT, City-20, Mumbai )..Appellant Vs. Arihant Impex )..Respondents ---- Mr.B.M.Chatterji i/by Ms.Anamica Malhotra for the appellant. Mr.S.N.Inamdar for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 1st April, 2009. PC 1. There are concurrent findings of fact. The questions of law as framed would not arise. Consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan