Case Law › High Court › The Cit City-22, Vashi Navi Mumbai v. M/...

The Cit City-22, Vashi Navi Mumbai v. M/S.super Construction Company

High Court 24 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit City-22, Vashi Navi Mumbai v. M/S.super Construction Company, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1752 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.774 OF 2005 The CIT City-22, Vashi Navi Mumbai ..Appellant Versus M/s.Super Construction Company ..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 24.03.2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 626 days delay in filing of the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit in support indicates that the file was sent to the Ministry of Law on 1/10/2003 for drafting an appeal memo but the appeal was received back on 10.2.2005. A period of more than one year and 4 months for drafting an appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. Therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence the Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.774 OF 2005 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, Appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.