Case LawHigh Court › The Cit City-8 v. M/S.zeus Air Services...

The Cit City-8 v. M/S.zeus Air Services Ltd

High Court 26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-8 v. M/S.zeus Air Services Ltd
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit City-8 v. M/S.zeus Air Services Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3339 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1417 OF 2005 The CIT City-8 ..Appellant Versus M/s.Zeus AIR Services Ltd., ..Respondents ---- Mr.S.M.Shah & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani with Subhash S.Shetty for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26th March, 2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 177 days in filing the appeal. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned subject to the appellant paying to the respondents cost quantified at Rs.5000/- within 12 weeks from today and also remove office objections within 12 weeks from today. Office to register the appeal. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1417 OF 2005 . Admit on questions of law as framed in paragraph-4 subject to the appellent comply with the order passed in Notice of Motion No.3339/2005. Respondents waives service. : 2 : (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan