The C.i.t. City-I Mumbai v. Tata Telecom Ltd
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The C.i.t. City-I Mumbai v. Tata Telecom Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The C.i.t. City-I Mumbai v. Tata Telecom Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.64 OF 2001
The C.I.T. City-I Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
Tata Telecom Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4.2.2008
PC
1. The questions of law are as formulated in
paragraph-5 of the memo of appeal.
2. In so far as question-(a) is concerned, the same
is answered in favour of the assessee by the
judgment of this Court reported in 261 ITR 275.
3. In so far as question-(b) is concerned, that was
merely a finding of fact. The Tribunal confirmed
the finding recorded by the CIT appeals.
4. Considering the above, there is no merit.
Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue