The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer Communication Pvt.ltd
High Court
04 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer Communication Pvt.ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer Communication Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.989 OF 2007
The CIT City-VII, Mumbai )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Pincer Communication Pvt.Ltd,)..Respondents
----
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.K.B.Bhujle for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4.3.2009.
PC
1. The revenue is in appeal on the following
questions of law:-
(a) Whether production of a commercials/advertising
films as per requirement of the overseas clients
amounts to manufacture of article or goods and
therefore assessee would be entitled to deduction
u/s.80HHC on export of such
commercials/advertisement films ?
(b) Whether work viz. editing, voice recording,
music recording dubbing etc. done by the assessee
for overseas buyers is job work as held by the
assessing officer or rendering technical services
as claimed by the assessee there by eligible for
the deduction u/s.80-0 ?
2. Question-(a) is covered by the judgment of this
Court in AbdulGafar A.Nadiadwala
Vs.Asstt.Commissioner of Income-tax & ors.
reported in 267 ITR 488 (Bom.).
: 2 :
3. In so far as question-(b) is concerned, we find
from the order of the Tribunal as also in the
appeal memo before the Tribunal that such a
question was not raised before the Tribunal. The
question raised before this Court must arise from
the order of the Tribunal. As the question was not
raised before the Tribunal, the same does not
arise. Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.