Case LawHigh Court › The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer C...

The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer Communication Pvt.ltd

High Court 04 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer Communication Pvt.ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.pincer Communication Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.989 OF 2007 The CIT City-VII, Mumbai )..Appellant Versus M/s.Pincer Communication Pvt.Ltd,)..Respondents ---- Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.K.B.Bhujle for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4.3.2009. PC 1. The revenue is in appeal on the following questions of law:- (a) Whether production of a commercials/advertising films as per requirement of the overseas clients amounts to manufacture of article or goods and therefore assessee would be entitled to deduction u/s.80HHC on export of such commercials/advertisement films ? (b) Whether work viz. editing, voice recording, music recording dubbing etc. done by the assessee for overseas buyers is job work as held by the assessing officer or rendering technical services as claimed by the assessee there by eligible for the deduction u/s.80-0 ? 2. Question-(a) is covered by the judgment of this Court in AbdulGafar A.Nadiadwala Vs.Asstt.Commissioner of Income-tax & ors. reported in 267 ITR 488 (Bom.). : 2 : 3. In so far as question-(b) is concerned, we find from the order of the Tribunal as also in the appeal memo before the Tribunal that such a question was not raised before the Tribunal. The question raised before this Court must arise from the order of the Tribunal. As the question was not raised before the Tribunal, the same does not arise. Consequently, appeal stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan