The Cit City-Viii Bombay v. L.g.s.finance & Consultancy P.ltd
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-Viii Bombay v. L.g.s.finance & Consultancy P.ltd
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit City-Viii Bombay v. L.g.s.finance & Consultancy P.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2499 OF 2002
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.735 OF 2002
The CIT City-VIII Bombay ..Appellant
Versus
L.G.S.Finance & Consultancy P.Ltd...Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 25 days. Considering the
cause shown, delay condoned.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.735 OF 2002
. In the instant case the assessee company has
advanced a loan in favour of one M/s.Vallabh Glass Factory. Vallabh Glass Factory was registered as a sick unit before the Board of Industrial Finance & Reconstruction (BIFR). The suit is filed by the assessee in this Court. The matter was settled for a sum of Rs.8 lakhs for the principal amount of Rs.10 lakhs. In these circumstances, Commissioner (Appeals) held that interest on the loan in question cannot be said as approved. In the appeal preferred by Revenue before ITAT the Tribunal concurred with
: 2 :
the finding recorded by CIT (A). In our opinion,
considering the facts on record, it is purely a
finding of fact and the question of law as framed
would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.