Case LawHigh Court › The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic Inte...

The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic International Ltd

High Court 04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic International Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic International Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.73 OF 2004 The CIT City-X ..Appellant Versus United Diagnostic International Ltd.,..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4.2.2008 PC 1. Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following question of law :- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT, was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of disallowance of Investment allowance under the provisions of Section 32A of Income Tax Act, following the decision of the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in case of CIT Vs.M.L.Agarwalla (1999) 238 ITR 603 (Gauhati) ?" 2. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner of appeals allowed the appeal of assessee following the decision of this Court in CIT Vs.IBM World Trade : 2 : Corporation reported in 130 ITR 739 (Bom). The Corporation Corporation Gauhati High Court has also taken a similar view in CIT Vs. M.L.Agarwalla (1999) 238 ITR 603 (Gauhati). 3. Considering the above, question as framed answered in favour of the assessee. 4. Appeal stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan