The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic International Ltd
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic International Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit City-X v. United Diagnostic International Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.73 OF 2004
The CIT City-X ..Appellant
Versus
United Diagnostic International Ltd.,..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4.2.2008
PC
1. Revenue has preferred this appeal on the
following question of law :-
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of
the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT, was
justified in deleting the addition made by
the Assessing Officer on account of
disallowance of Investment allowance under
the provisions of Section 32A of Income
Tax Act, following the decision of the
Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in case of CIT
Vs.M.L.Agarwalla (1999) 238 ITR 603
(Gauhati) ?"
2. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner of appeals allowed the appeal of assessee following the decision of this Court in CIT Vs.IBM World Trade
: 2 :
Corporation reported in 130 ITR 739 (Bom). The
Corporation
Corporation
Gauhati High Court has also taken a similar view in
CIT Vs. M.L.Agarwalla (1999) 238 ITR 603 (Gauhati).
3. Considering the above, question as framed
answered in favour of the assessee.
4. Appeal stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.