The Cit-City Xii, Mumbai v. Jagjit Singh Nagpal
High Court
13 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-City Xii, Mumbai v. Jagjit Singh Nagpal
Date of order
13 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-City Xii, Mumbai v. Jagjit Singh Nagpal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.301 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.114 OF 2004
The CIT-City XII, Mumbai )..Appellant
Versus
Jagjit Singh Nagpal )..Respondent
And
Smt.Sudarshan Nagpal & Ors. )..Applicants
----
Mr.N.A.Kazi for the appellant.
Mr.Jamshed Ansari i/by S.Mahomedbhai & Co. for the
applicants in support.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 13.3.2009.
PC
1. By the present Notice of Motion, the applicants
who are legal heirs of deceased Jagjit Singh Nagpal,
prayed for recall and setting aside of the order
dated 22.1.2004 in Income-tax Appeal No.114/2004
which is the order condoning delay as also to recall
the order dated 14.12.2004 which is the order
admitting the appeal.
2. The ITAT was pleaed to dispose off the appeal
pending before it on 11.7.2001. The appeal
preferred by the revenue was dismissed. Revenue
thereafter preferred the present appeal sometime on
: 2 :
2.4.2002. The assessee/respondent expired on
29.6.2001. In other words, the appeal was preferred
against a dead person. In the light of that, in our
opinion, the impugned orders will have to be
recalled with liberty to the department/revenue to
take out proceedings for bringing on record the
heirs of the deceased Jagjit Singh Nagpal. Motion
disposed off accordingly.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.