The Cit City-Xii Mumbai v. M/S.nahar & Seth Enterprises
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit City-Xii Mumbai v. M/S.nahar & Seth Enterprises
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit City-Xii Mumbai v. M/S.nahar & Seth Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.546 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.190 OF 2004
The CIT City-XII Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Nahar & Seth Enterprises ..Respondents
----
Mr.A.S.Rao & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 269 days. We have also
heard the appeal on merits. Cconsidering the cause
shown, delay condoned.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.190 OF 2004
. The question of law which arises here are the
same which arose in Income Tax Appeal (L)
No.189/2004. For the reasons set out therein,
question of law does not arise and consequently,
appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue