The Cit-I v. M/S.dharmesh Financers & Investment Co
High Court
07 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-I v. M/S.dharmesh Financers & Investment Co
Date of order
07 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-I v. M/S.dharmesh Financers & Investment Co, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.109 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.109 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.109 OF 2006
The CIT-I .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dharmesh Financers & Investment Co. .. Respondent
Mr.S.K.Bhatnagar with Mr.N.R.Prajapati for Appellant.
Mr.A.R.Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 7th October, 2008
DATE : 7th October, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Mr.Bhatnagar, the learned Counsel for the Appellant
seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is
therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as
per the rules.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue