The Cit-Ii Mumbai v. M/S.lazor Syntex (P) Ltd
High Court
18 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-Ii Mumbai v. M/S.lazor Syntex (P) Ltd
Date of order
18 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-Ii Mumbai v. M/S.lazor Syntex (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.207 OF 2005
The CIT-II Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Lazor Syntex (P) Ltd., ..Respondents
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.03.2008.
PC
1. The questions as framed in paragraph-5 of the
appeal memo are covered by the judgment of this
Court in CIT V/s. M/s.Saumya Finance & LeasingCo.(P) Ltd., in Income Tax Appeal No.56 of 2005
decided on 23rd January, 2008.
2. In the light of the above, the questions as
framed would not arise and consequently, appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue