The Cit- Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.nainraj Investment Pvt. Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2712 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2712 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2712 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1431 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1431 OF 2006 The CIT- IV, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Nainraj Investment Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.Pritesh Rajgor i/by M/s.PDS Legal for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8th April, 2008 DATE : 8th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant-revenue and the learned Counsel for the Respondent-assessee. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 16 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on 21.04.2008. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)