The Cit, Kolhapur v. Shri.sadashivrao Mandlik Sahakari
High Court
15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit, Kolhapur v. Shri.sadashivrao Mandlik Sahakari
Date of order
15 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit, Kolhapur v. Shri.sadashivrao Mandlik Sahakari, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the present Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2715 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2715 OF 2007
The CIT, Kolhapur .. Appellant
Vs.
Shri.Sadashivrao Mandlik Sahakari
Karkhana Ltd. .. Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.
Mr. A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 15th April, 2008
DATE : 15th April, 2008
DATE : 15th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. By consent, the Appeal is taken up for
admission. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
The learned Counsel for both parties agree that the
questions of law raised in the present Appeal are
squarely covered against the revenue by the judgment of
this Court dated 14.08.2007 passed in ITXA 318/2007 and
other connected Appeals. Hence, the present Appeal also
stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue