Case LawHigh Court › The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.crest Comm...

The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.crest Communications P.ltd

High Court 17 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.crest Communications P.ltd
Date of order
17 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.crest Communications P.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4485 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2540 OF 2007 The CIT Mumbai City-11 ..Appellant Versus M/s.Crest Communications P.Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.B.V.Zaveri for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.3.2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 818 days delay in filing the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support, indicates that the Judicial CIT granted approval for filing appeal on 12.7.2005 and the appeal was filed thereafter on 29.10.2007. No dates have been given in respect of events which occured between the aforesaid period. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2540 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan