Case Law › High Court › The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.jitendra K...

The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.jitendra Kapoor

High Court 04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.jitendra Kapoor, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4280 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2271 OF 2007 The CIT Mumbai City-11 ..Appellant Versus M/s.Jitendra Kapoor ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.K.Gopal & Jitendra Singh for the respondent ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4th March, 2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 499 days delay in filing the appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the same is vague. No dates have been given in respect of events which took place after the passing of the impugned order on 20.12.2005 and the filing of the appeal on 28.9.2007. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2271 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.