The Cit Mumbai City-12 v. M/S.roopkala Exports Corporation
High Court
12 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Mumbai City-12 v. M/S.roopkala Exports Corporation
Date of order
12 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Cit Mumbai City-12 v. M/S.roopkala Exports Corporation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.727 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.237 OF 2006
The CIT Mumbai City-12 ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Roopkala Exports Corporation ..Respondent
----
Mr.A.S.Rao & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Dr.K.Shivram with Ajay R.Singh for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 12.03.2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 564 days.
2. Question-(A) of paragraph-4 is covered by the
judgment of the Supreme Court in 295 ITR 454 (SC) in
favour of the assessee.
3. Question-(B) is covered in favour of the
assessee in view of the Finance Act w.e.f.
1.4.1992.
4. Considering the above, Motion alongwith Appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue