Case Law › High Court › The Cit Mumbai City-20 v. Shri Jaigopal...

The Cit Mumbai City-20 v. Shri Jaigopal Kabra

High Court 18 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit Mumbai City-20 v. Shri Jaigopal Kabra, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1748 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.768 OF 2005 The CIT Mumbai City-20 ..Appellant Versus Shri Jaigopal Kabra ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.3.2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 408 days delay in filing the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support, indicates that the Chief CIT granted approval for filing appeal on 29.4.2004 but the appeal thereafter came to be filed on 16.6.2005. No dates have been given in respect of the events which occured between the aforesaid period. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.768 OF 2005 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.