The Cit, Mumbai City-7 v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co.ltd
High Court
04 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit, Mumbai City-7 v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co.ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit, Mumbai City-7 v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1279 of 2005
The CIT, Mumbai City-7 )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Geoffrey Manners & Co.Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.Sanjiv M.Shah for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4.3.2009.
PC
1. On behalf of assessee, learned Counsel
submitted a chart to show that the total tax effect
is Rs.3,83,761/- and not Rs.5,59,684/- as set out
in the appeal memo. Learned Counsel for the
revenue has taken instructions from the department
concerned and states that the amount of tax shown
as Rs.5,59,684/- is not correct. In the light of
that, learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw this
appeal. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of
court fees as per rules.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue