The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood & Co
High Court
08 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood & Co
Date of order
08 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood & Co, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3947 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3947 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3947 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2412 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2412 OF 2007
The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3948 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3948 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3948 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2410 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2410 OF 2007
The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3949 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3949 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3949 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2411 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2411 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2411 OF 2007
The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3953 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3953 OF 2007
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2414 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2414 OF 2007
The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3960 OF 2007
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2413 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2413 OF 2007
The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent
Mr.Suraj M.Shah for the Appellants.
Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Respondents.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8th April, 2008
DATE : 8th April, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
these Notices of Motion, the Appellant-Revenue is
seeking condonation of 276 days’ delay caused in filing
the respective Appeals. For the reasons stated in the
affidavits-in-support of the Notices of Motion,
sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay,
and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of
bonafide on the part of the Appellant-Revenue. Hence,
all the aforesaid five Notices of Motion are made
absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) respectively.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue