Case LawHigh Court › The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood &...

The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood & Co

High Court 08 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood & Co
Date of order
08 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit- Mumbai City-Xiv v. M/S.dawood & Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view thereof, the present Appeals also stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2412 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2412 OF 2007 The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2410 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2410 OF 2007 The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2411 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2411 OF 2007 The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2414 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2414 OF 2007 The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2413 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2413 OF 2007 The CIT- Mumbai City-XIV .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Dawood & Co. .. Respondent Mr.Suraj M.Shah for the Appellants. Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Respondents. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8th April, 2008 DATE : 8th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. By consent the aforesaid Appeals are taken up for admission. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In the impugned order the Tribunal has relied upon the decision pertaining to case of Metro Shoes Metro ShoesLimited. On the said decision the Commissioner of Limited Income Tax had filed various Appeals before this Court, and the Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 3rd March, 2008 has dismissed all the Appeals. In view thereof, the present Appeals also stand dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan