The C.i.t. Mumbai City Xvi v. M/S.bombay Cold Storage
High Court
08 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The C.i.t. Mumbai City Xvi v. M/S.bombay Cold Storage
Date of order
08 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The C.i.t. Mumbai City Xvi v. M/S.bombay Cold Storage, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.981 OF 2004
The C.I.T. Mumbai City XVI .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Bombay Cold Storage .. Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1. The Tribunal has concurred with the finding
of fact recorded by the C.I.T. (A) that 97% of the
sales made by the appellant was to the sister
concerns and the sister concerns had advanced
substantial amounts. In these circumstances, the
Tribunal observed that selling ice to the sister
concern at a rate lesser than to the outsiders is
understandable. This is purely a finding of fact.
2. In the light of that, question of law as
framed would not arise. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.