The Cit Mumbai City Xvii v. M/S.arya Steel
High Court
12 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Mumbai City Xvii v. M/S.arya Steel
Date of order
12 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit Mumbai City Xvii v. M/S.arya Steel, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.866 OF 2007
The CIT Mumbai City XVII ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Arya Steel ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 12.03.2008.
PC
1. The question of law pertains to use of land
belonging to The Gujarat Maritime Board for
utilising as ship breaking plots. The period for
which the assessee is entitled to use is 10 years.
2. A similar issue has came up for consideration
before us in CIT Vs. Choudhary Enterprises. By a
speaking judgment, the said appeal filed by the
revenue has been dismissed.
3. Considering the judgment, the question as framed
would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue