The Cit Mumbai v. Akbar Amirali Jaffer
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Mumbai v. Akbar Amirali Jaffer
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit Mumbai v. Akbar Amirali Jaffer, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2271 OF 2007
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.575 OF 2007
The CIT Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
Akbar Amirali Jaffer ..Respondents
----
Mr.A.S.Rao & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. The reasons given in this motion for condoning
delay of 358 days are the same which were given for
condoning delay in Notice of Motion No.2266/2007 in
Income Tax Appeal (L) No.571/2007. For the reasons
set out therein, in our opinion, the cause shown
does not amount to sufficient cause and consequently
motion dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.575 OF 2007
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue