Case LawHigh Court › The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Developmen...

The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Development Finance Corpn.ltd

High Court 25 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Development Finance Corpn.ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Development Finance Corpn.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: In this Appeal, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised in this Appeal:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and in law the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 32AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though the assets are neither received n...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.406 OF 2002 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.406 OF 2002 The CIT Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Housing Development Finance Corpn.Ltd... Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for Appellant. Mr.F.V.Irani i/by Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 25th September, 2008 DATE : 25th September, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In this Appeal, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised in this Appeal:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and in law the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 32AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though the assets are neither received nor used during the relevant period? " 2. Perused the Tribunal’s order dated 25.09.2001. In paragraph No.4 of the order the Tribunal has clearly observed that the issue as to whether depositing the money with the Development Bank entitles the assessee for deduction under section 32 AB was not an issue before the Tax Authorities and in fact there was no deposit made in the previous year relevant to the Assessment Year under consideration. In view thereof, the Tribunal has remarked that the issue was academic. Under these circumstances, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan