The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Development Finance Corpn.ltd
High Court
25 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Development Finance Corpn.ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit Mumbai v. M/S.housing Development Finance Corpn.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: In this Appeal, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised in this Appeal:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and in law the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 32AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though the assets are neither received n...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.406 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.406 OF 2002
The CIT Mumbai .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Housing Development Finance Corpn.Ltd... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for Appellant.
Mr.F.V.Irani i/by Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 25th September, 2008
DATE : 25th September, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In this
Appeal, the following substantial question of law is
sought to be raised in this Appeal:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case, and in law the assessee is entitled for
deduction under section 32AB of the Income Tax Act,
1961 even though the assets are neither received nor
used during the relevant period? "
2. Perused the Tribunal’s order dated 25.09.2001. In
paragraph No.4 of the order the Tribunal has clearly
observed that the issue as to whether depositing the
money with the Development Bank entitles the assessee
for deduction under section 32 AB was not an issue
before the Tax Authorities and in fact there was no
deposit made in the previous year relevant to the
Assessment Year under consideration. In view thereof,
the Tribunal has remarked that the issue was academic.
Under these circumstances, we do not find any
substantial question of law involved in this Appeal.
Appeal stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.