Case LawHigh Court › The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.lords Footwear

The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.lords Footwear

High Court 15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.lords Footwear
Date of order
15 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.lords Footwear, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: On the same reasoning, both the present Appeals also stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.149 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.149 OF 2007 The CIT, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Lords Footwear .. Respondent WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.150 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.150 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.150 OF 2007 The CIT, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. Smt.Sabah H.Kapadia .. Respondent Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant. Mr. A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 15th April, 2008 DATE : 15th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. By consent, both the Appeals are taken up for admission. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for both parties agree that the questions raised in the present Appeals were also raised in Appeal No.367/2002 & other connected Appeals in the case of CIT V/s Metro Shoes Ltd. CIT V/s Metro Shoes Ltd., and this Court by an order dated 3rd March, 2008 has held that the questions raised in those Appeals were purely questions of fact, and that there was no substantial question of law involved, and accordingly Appeal No.367/2002 and other connected Appeals were dismissed. On the same reasoning, both the present Appeals also stand dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan