The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.regal Shoes
High Court
15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.regal Shoes
Date of order
15 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit, Mumbai v. M/S.regal Shoes, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On the same reasoning, the present Appeals also stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.42 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.42 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.42 OF 2007
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.43 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.43 OF 2007
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.44 OF 2007
The CIT, Mumbai .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Regal Shoes .. Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.
Mr. A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 15th April, 2008
DATE : 15th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. By consent, all the three Appeals are taken up
for admission. Heard the learned Counsel for the
parties. The learned Counsel for both parties agree
that the questions raised in the present Appeals were
also raised in the Appeal No.367/2002 & other connected
Appeals in the case of CIT V/s Metro Shoes Ltd., and
this Court by an order dated 3rd March, 2008 has held
that the questions raised in those Appeals were purely
questions of fact, and that there was no substantial
question of law involved, and accordingly Appeal
No.367/2002 and other connected Appeals were dismissed.
On the same reasoning, the present Appeals also stand
dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.