Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-Tds v. M/S.united Storage & Tank...

The Cit-Tds v. M/S.united Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd

High Court 03 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-Tds v. M/S.united Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd
Date of order
03 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-Tds v. M/S.united Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.139 OF 2005 The CIT-TDS ..Appellant Versus M/s.United Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 3rd March 2008. PC 1. The learned Tribunal relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay V/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., reported in 1991 CTR 135 (SC) and distinguished the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT V/s. Gwalior Rayons Silk Manufacturing Co.Ltd., reported in 196 ITR 149. 2. The issue arose out of payment of storage charges paid for the rent of storage tank. 3. Considering the finding recorded by the Tribunal and judgment of the Supreme Court, the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan