The Cit- Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.rajiv Piramal Investment Pvt.ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3340 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3340 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3340 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1289 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1289 OF 2007 The CIT- VII, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Rajiv Piramal Investment Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8th April, 2008 DATE : 8th April, 2008 DATE : 8th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant-revenue. None appears for the Respondent-assessee, though served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 82 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission after three weeks. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)