The Cit v. Central Bank Of India
High Court
22 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Central Bank Of India
Date of order
22 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Central Bank Of India, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion, the Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2123 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2123 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2123 OF 2002
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.566 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.566 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.566 OF 2002
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
Central Bank of India .. Respondent
None for the Appellant.
Mr.Firoz B.Andhyarujina, Sr.Advocate with Ms.R.M.Sidhwa
for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. This Notice of Motion has been registered by the
Appellant on 15.1.2003. Today nobody is appearing on
behalf of the Appellant. The learned Sr.Counsel for the
Respondent is present. Notice of Motion stands
dismissed in default.
2. In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion, the Appeal
also stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.