The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai
High Court
19 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai
Date of order
19 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited -(2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom), the present Appeals 1092/2008 & 1093/2008 stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2008
AND
AND
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2008
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
Loknete Balasaheb Desai .. Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 19th September, 2008
DATE : 19th September, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. In
view of the judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited -(2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom), the present Appeals 1092/2008
& 1093/2008 stand dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.