Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai

The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai

High Court 19 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai
Date of order
19 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited -(2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom), the present Appeals 1092/2008 & 1093/2008 stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2008 AND AND AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2008 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. Loknete Balasaheb Desai .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 19th September, 2008 DATE : 19th September, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited -(2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom), the present Appeals 1092/2008 & 1093/2008 stand dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan