The Cit v. Mah.state Govt.employees Confederation
High Court
26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Mah.state Govt.employees Confederation
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Mah.state Govt.employees Confederation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3460 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2011 OF 2007
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
Mah.State Govt.Employees Confederation..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Mr.A.S.Rao for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26.02.2008
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 562 days delay
in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the
affidavit-in-support indicates that the file was
sent to the panel Counsel for drafting appeal memo
on 16.6.2006. The draft appeal memo was furnished
after 4 months in October 2006. Even after the
draft appeal memo was ready a letter was written for
Court fee stamp after delay of further period of 4
months on 21.2.2007. The stamps were available on
5.7.2007 but the appeal was filed after further
delay of about 3 months on 3.9.2007. In our view,
the delay caused between the aforesaid period has
not been properly explained. Therefore, the cause
shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence,
Motion stands dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.