The Cit v. Mohan T.kukreja
High Court
26 Nov 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Mohan T.kukreja
Date of order
26 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Mohan T.kukreja, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, Appeal stands dismissed in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.372 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.372 OF 2005
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
Mohan T.Kukreja .. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 26th November, 2008
DATE : 26th November, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Advocate Mr.Suresh Kumar states that though he
has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the Appellant,
the Department has taken back all the papers/file
relating to this Appeal asking him not to appear.
Today, none appears for the Appellant. Hence, Appeal
stands dismissed in default.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue