The Cit v. Mr.anand A.merani
High Court
02 Aug 2003 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Mr.anand A.merani
Date of order
02 Aug 2003
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Mr.anand A.merani, the High Court (2003) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the C.B.D.T.Circular, this Appeal stands dismissed as the tax effect involved in this Appeal is less than Rs.4 lakhs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.443 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.443 OF 2003
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
Mr.Anand A.Merani .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Shivsharan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 28th August, 2008
DATE : 28th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. In view of the C.B.D.T.Circular, this Appeal stands
dismissed as the tax effect involved in this Appeal is
less than Rs.4 lakhs.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue