Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. Mrs.veena Devgan

The Cit v. Mrs.veena Devgan

High Court 17 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Mrs.veena Devgan
Date of order
17 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. Mrs.veena Devgan, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4486 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2539 OF 2007 The CIT- ..Appellant Versus Mrs.Veena Devgan ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Subhash S.Shetty for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 17.3.2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 1104 days delay in filing the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support, indicates that the Judicial CIT approved the filing of the appeal on 19.10.2005 and thereafter file was sent for drafting appeal memo. The appeal ultimately came to be filed on 29.10.2007. No dates have been given in respect of events which occured between the aforesaid period. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2539 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan