The Cit v. M/S.anuchit Traders Pvt. Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.794 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.794 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.794 OF 2004 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.202 OF 2004 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Anuchit Traders Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry alongwith Mr.P.C.Tripathy i/by Mr.Raj Darak for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 25th September, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 112 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)