The Cit v. M/S.baroda Rayon Corporation Ltd
High Court
11 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.baroda Rayon Corporation Ltd
Date of order
11 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. M/S.baroda Rayon Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: So far as the Appeal is concerned, the same has already been disposed of by an order dated 4.9.2007.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3076 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3076 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3076 OF 2006
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1142 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1142 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1142 OF 2005
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Baroda Rayon Corporation Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 11h September, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
So far as the Appeal is concerned, the same has
already been disposed of by an order dated 4.9.2007. In
view thereof, the present Notice of Motion does not
survive, and hence, the same stands disposed of.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue