Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. M/S.bombay Diamond Co.ltd

The Cit v. M/S.bombay Diamond Co.ltd

High Court 25 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.bombay Diamond Co.ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.bombay Diamond Co.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2096 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2096 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2096 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1670 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1670 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1670 OF 2008 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Bombay Diamond Co.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 25th September, 2008 DATE : 25th September, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 1420 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. The Appeal is against the ITAT’s order dated 27.1.2004. It appears that though the last date for filing the Appeal was 12.7.2004, the Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 2.6.2008. We are not satisfied with the reasons given for condonation of delay. The reasons given for delay that of getting the draft memo of Appeal prepared and that of the other reasons beyond the control of the Appellant’s office including the administrative difficulties etc. does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1670/2008 also stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan