Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. M/S.cheemo Leather Boutique

The Cit v. M/S.cheemo Leather Boutique

High Court 28 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.cheemo Leather Boutique
Date of order
28 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.cheemo Leather Boutique, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: All the three Appeals stand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.556 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.556 OF 2003 WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.557 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.557 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.557 OF 2003 WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.558 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.558 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.558 OF 2003 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Cheemo Leather Boutique .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/by Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan for Appellant. Mr.Sanjiv M.Shah for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 28th August, 2008 DATE : 28th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state that the question of law raised in these Appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 3.3.2008 passed in the ITXA 367 of 2002 & other connected Appeals in the case of The CIT The CITV/s.M/s.Metro Shoes Limited, in favour of the Assessee V/s.M/s.Metro Shoes Limited, and against the Revenue. In view thereof, the question of law raised in the above Appeals is answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. All the three Appeals stand disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan