Case Law › High Court › The Cit v. M/S.cyril Traders Ltd

The Cit v. M/S.cyril Traders Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.cyril Traders Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2370 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1104 OF 2007 The CIT ..Appellant Versus M/s.Cyril Traders Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta @ Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Mr.A.S.Rao for the appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008 PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 1097 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the scrutiny report was received in the office of jurisdictional CIT on 25.2.2004 and thereafter file was sent to Counsel for drafting of appeal on 20.12.2006. There is no explanation for the delay caused between the aforesaid 2 dates. Therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion stands dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1104 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.