The Cit v. M/S.dhanpankaj Polyster
High Court
19 Sep 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.dhanpankaj Polyster
Date of order
19 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Cit v. M/S.dhanpankaj Polyster, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1019 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1019 OF 2008
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dhanpankaj Polyster .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Shivsaran for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 19th September, 2008
DATE : 19th September, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. Permissible
Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue