In The Cit v. M/S.esteem Textiles Trading P.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2366 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1134 OF 2007
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Esteem Textiles Trading P.Ltd...Respondent
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 25.02.2008
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 1030 days delay
in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the
affidavit-in-support indicates that the scrutiny
report was received in the office of jurisdictional
CIT on 7.4.2004 but thereafter the file was sent to
Counsel for drafting appeal memo after more than 2
years and 8 months on 20.12.2006. The delay caused
between the aforesaid period has not been explained.
Therefore, the cause shown does not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence, Motion stands dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1134 OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue