Case Law › High Court › The Cit v. M/S.hyd Air Engineering Works

The Cit v. M/S.hyd Air Engineering Works

High Court 28 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.hyd Air Engineering Works, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.970 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.970 OF 200 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Hyd Air Engineering Works .. Respondent Mr.K.R.Chaudhari for the Appellant. Mr.Mandar Vaidya for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 28th August, 2008 DATE : 28th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal as the tax effect involved in this Appeal is less than Rs.4 lakhs. Leave granted. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the Rules. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.