Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. M/S.jay Diamond Corpn

The Cit v. M/S.jay Diamond Corpn

High Court 14 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.jay Diamond Corpn
Date of order
14 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.jay Diamond Corpn, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2809 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1454 OF 2006 The CIT ..Appellant Versus M/s.Jay Diamond Corpn. ...Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. None for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 14.01.2008. PC 1. Heard Advocate for the appellant. 2. This is a Motion for condonation of 201 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in our view, sufficient cause has been shown. No affidavit in reply has been filed. Hence, we accept the cause shown as sufficient cause and condone the delay subject to payment of Rs.2500/- as cost to the respondent. Cost to be paid to the respondent within a period of four weeks from today. Notice of Motion allowed accordingly. 3. It is also made clear that if the respondent has : 2 : any grievance relating to non effecting of service of this Notice of Motion, he is at liberty to apply for recall of this order. (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan