The Cit v. M/S.miku Agencies
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.miku Agencies
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. M/S.miku Agencies, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.543 OF 2004
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.186 OF 2004
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Miku Agencies ..Respondent
----
Mr.R.G.Bhat & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Usha I.Dalal for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs,
learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Motion
and Appeal. Motion alongwith Appeal dismissed as
withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
2. The question of law, if any, is kept open for
consideration in appropriate case.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue