The Cit v. M/S.nimbus Communication Ltd
High Court
27 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.nimbus Communication Ltd
Date of order
27 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. M/S.nimbus Communication Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4175 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1917 OF 2007
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Nimbus Communication Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.A.D.Kango @ Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 27.02.2008
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 938 days delay in
filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the
affidavit-in-support, we find that the matter was
sent to the Govt. Advocate on 24.2.2005 for
preparing appeal memo and the appeal ultimately came
to be filed more than 2 years & 6 months later on
22.8.2007. No dates have been given in respect of
events which occurred between aforesaid 2 dates.
Therefore, the cause shown does not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence, Motion stands dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1917 OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue