The Cit v. M/S.sanjay Knit Pvt.ltd
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.sanjay Knit Pvt.ltd
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. M/S.sanjay Knit Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1977 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.811 OF 2004
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sanjay Knit Pvt.Ltd., ..Respondents
----
Mr.A.D.Kango & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 48 days. We have also heard
the learned Counsel for revenue on admission of
appeal. For the reasons given, delay condoned.
Office to register the appeal.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.811 OF 2004
. The assessee constructed bus shelters for Pune
Municipal Transport Undertaking and in return was
entitled to display advertisements on payment of
rent as set out in the order. Commissioner
(Appeals) on the facts arrived at the conclusion
that the same was not a capital expenditure but
revenue expenditure and accordingly allowed the
appeal.
: 2 :
2. In the appeal preferred by revenue before ITAT
the Tribunal recorded finding that in so far as the
asset is concerned, assessee is not entitled to any
depreciation and the same can be claimed by the
Corporation. On the facts held that the expenditure
is in the nature of revenue expenditure. These are
purely findings of fact. The question as framed
would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.